跳到主要內容

向中國政府投擲的深水炸彈:20張底片,提出六四事件最真切證據

2014年12月,長居在北京的攝影藝術家徐勇,透過香港新世紀出版社發行了一本攝影集《NEGATIVES》(底片),內容是他壓藏多年的天安門事件影像。
天安門事件發生時,35歲的徐勇剛離開北京最大廣告公司的攝影師工作,中國社會也剛從10年的文化大革命(1966年~1976年)中復甦起來,改革開放的思潮逐漸匯集,天安門廣場原本單純的胡耀邦逝世追悼會,變成學生與民眾陳抗聚會。徐勇也深受感染,帶著粗重的相機,經常到現場去拍照記錄,還曾經為了捕捉好一點的鏡頭,多次站到單車上,結果跌了下來。在他鏡頭前面的青年們,是一個個懷抱理想與熱血、憂慮與期盼的面容。
這次《報導者》透過電子郵件,與人在北京的徐勇進行訪談,同時在《報導者》披露一組新作《NEGATIVES・SCAN》。這個作品是在2014年《NEGATIVES》發表4年之後,徐勇於2018年製作的。這次的作品,作為基礎材料的膠片與當年天安門事件影像是同一批,但挑選的影像內容則不盡相同,新作相比原來的《NEGATIVES》,保留了完整35mm膠片輪廓,還保留了滾筒式掃描工藝和膠片局部氧化變色的痕跡,充分強調膠片影像的物理性質,限縮了影像負片內容的表現空間。這組影像除了在今年(2019)2月至3月間,應德國漢堡大學漢學系之邀,在漢堡中央圖書館舉行過展覽外,尚未以其他方式發表過。
《NEGATIVES・SCAN》系列(照片提供/徐勇)
用底片,向中國當局的隱瞞發出挑戰
徐勇對於新作的思考,是從《NEGATIVES》那本攝影集出版後不久開始的。徐勇表示,傳統攝影的敘事性與當代攝影的概念性好比兩個相交的圓,相交重疊部分的面積不同,則呈現作者思考、價值判斷的不同。
《NEGATIVES》系列因客觀政治環境和時間因素,負片呈現和數位設備反轉觀看
在新版IOS裝置(iPhone或iPad)上設置——「一般功能」下的「輔助使用」選項下選「顯示器調節」、「反相顏色」、「經典反相」——通過攝像頭,你就可以看到徐勇的底片沖洗後的模樣。

,也許是成功的觀念傳達,但畫面內容的佔比,和影像秩序的編排,更多的顯現了徐勇個人對事件的情感立場和作品的敘事性。

新作品《NEGATIVES・SCAN》則是試圖弱化他作為作者的主觀立場和敘事,突顯作品的概念性,使得新舊作品避免重複,更是對官方遮蔽和製造遺忘歷史態度提供更強烈的證據:「底片及其影像的物質性存在,作為事實依據,無法人為遮蔽篡改,並且隨時間移轉證明了更多的意義。」徐勇為這組新作寫下了自己的立場與觀點。
前後兩個「底片」系列作品的偶然性在於,天安門事件的大量照片當年已廣泛在世界上公開,但在中國,超過四分之一世紀後它們還不能正常發表,卻是現實。不要說影像遭到官方封鎖屏蔽,連相關字詞也遭株連,出版這樣一批禁忌的影像,徐勇從不直接談論影像內容,在他的考量中,底片那無法更改的物質性與證據性是他思考的最優先,內容是其次。
《NEGATIVES》全書中沒有一張流血的衝突畫面,最後僅以一張坦克清場的天安門收尾,該頁的騎縫處標記著「64」頁碼;而這次《報導者》收到的《NEGATIVES・SCAN》共有20張新作,最後一張是舊版沒有的天安門清場大景,倒數第二張則是一群士兵舉著槍對著牽單車的兩名民眾,從這樣的安排我們似乎可以嗅到徐勇的意念。
《NEGATIVES・SCAN》系列(照片提供/徐勇)
寄回國內的攝影集,都被沒收了
天安門事件攝影之後,徐勇進行了他的《胡同101像》拍攝計畫,這個計畫源自於1985年他為美國一家電視台拍攝「中國畫」專題片裡的胡同鏡頭開始。執行時間落在了天安門事件剛結束的1989年6月下旬,他內心情緒受到事件很大的影響,那時北京市內氣氛一片沉寂,徐勇個人也因此有了大量空餘時間。
《胡同101像》是文革後中國的第一本個人專題性攝影集,序言講了關於一條胡同的美麗傳說,構思和編排方式,來自他在北京廣告公司拍攝電視專題片的經驗,鏡頭選擇避免攝影類型學,圖像編排注重翻閱者的意識與流動。胡同原本充滿人聲而熱鬧,他卻刻意排除了鏡頭中所有的人,到了最後,第101張拍攝雜院裡的三代一家人時,他採用了他們以肅穆眼神望向鏡頭的肖像照片。《胡同101像》後來由日本的新潮社和平凡社先後出了日本版。
作為一件整體的作品,《胡同101像》或有預先的架構設計、觀念性思考;相對地,天安門事件中的攝影,徐勇都是對現場的紀錄。但與在場的西方攝影記者不同,他是本地人,他必須承認情感立場對自己觀看和拍攝的影響。由於受到現代攝影、經典攝影和廣告公司專業攝影的影響,徐勇當時著重攝影的畫面感,之於當時將攝影作為信息傳播媒介,把公眾知情權作為最重要責任的紀錄攝影者,他認為這不是好的價值觀。另外,那時彩色底片一卷的價格,相當於普通北京民眾三分之一個月的工資,他必須相當有自律地去按快門,注重每張照片的質量,每個場景的拍攝最多2、3張。如果事件發生在今天,徐勇說他的攝影記錄方式會很不一樣。這或許也反過來說明,古典攝影觀看的意義,已終結於上個世紀90年代數位攝影的興起。
問到徐勇是否看過自己出版的攝影集及近況,他表示手邊有2014年出版、及後來德國、法國出版的《NEGATIVES》攝影集,是自己到香港、或託付好朋友路過香港時,每次3、4本,一次一次帶回來的,通過北京機場海關還要小心謹慎。一開始他也試過從國外用聯邦快遞郵寄,但都被海關沒收了。
由於攝影集發行當時有不少國外媒體報導,「官方(指中國當局)知道我的這本《NEGATIVES》,在他們眼裡我應該是異類,但還好,沒有找我太大的麻煩。在國內,這本攝影集也只能給可以信任的好朋友看看。」
🄴🄽
Louder than Bombs: The Photo Negatives Exposing the Truth of the Tiananmen Square Protests
Thirty years after students rushed into Tiananmen Square to demand greater democratic accountability, the political atmosphere in contemporary Chinese society is more oppressed than ever, and people err on the side of caution when talking about the historic event in public or private. In fact, for many young people in China, the student protests that lead to the crackdown on June 4th are of no concern to them, or they’re simply not aware of the event’s existence.
65-year-old photographer Xu Yong (徐勇) wants to change that. Over the past few years, he’s collected two series of Tiananmen Square images he captured at the time. Xu has compared this curation process to a deep, underwater explosion : these images lay dormant in the public’s subconscious, and by exhibiting these photo negatives 30 years later, they send ripples of truth to the surface.
Fill 1
In December 2014, Xu Yong, a photographer based in Beijing, put together a photobook of film negatives he captured during the infamous Tiananmen Square protests. He held off publishing the images for years.
On the eve of the 1989 protests, Xu was a 35-year-old photographer who just left a prime position at Beijing’s largest advertising agency.
Chinese society was still recovering from the decade-long Cultural Revolution, and the ideological trends of Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) “Reform and Opening Up” were finally taking hold. The students who first gathered in Tiananmen Square were only there to commemorate the death of Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦) , a former general secretary who staked out a position as a reformer within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). But the gathering soon morphed into a full-on student protest movement.
Xu Yong was deeply affected by the protests. He took his bulky camera to the square, and captured images of young faces full of idealism and high hopes, as well as ardor and anxiety.
With the help of Hong Kong’s New Century Press, the photo negatives resurfaced in a photobook called Negatives. In a recent interview with The Reporter in Beijing, Xu disclosed a new series of photo negatives to publish : “Negatives/Scan”.
In this new collection, the film stock and the content appear to become one, and the images retain the complete 35mm film roll outline, as well as traces of local oxidation and discolouration from the film washing process. In effect, the physical properties of the film are fully emphasized and the performance space of the content is limited.
The images were first shown at an exhibition at the Hamburg Central Library at the invitation of the University of Hamburg’s Department of Chinese Languages and Culture.
Negative/Scan. (Photo by Xu Yong)
Using film negatives to challenge censorship
Xu began thinking about a new series shortly after publishing Negatives. He says the narrative nature of traditional photography and the conceptual nature of contemporary photography are like two intersecting circles. When the circles overlap, they show the artist’s different modes of thinking and values.
Because factors like time and the political environment in China are changing how we view the Tiananmen Square protests, using inverse colours and digital tools on our computers and phones could be a way to break through those barriers.
Xu recommends viewers to look at the Negatives/Scan series from their computer, and use their mobile phone as a decoder to invert the photo negatives to a standard colour scheme. If you use an iPhone, head over to Settings, choose “general” then “accessibility” and select “display accommodations”. Under “Invert colours”, tap the “classic invert” slider, then select the camera function to view the photos.
The image proportions and picture order of Negatives/Scan say much about Xu Yong’s feelings towards Tiananmen Square and the narrative nature of his work. The series is an attempt to weaken his subjective viewpoint and highlight the conceptual nature of the pictures. Old images seem new, and help to expose the government’s attempt to cover-up the event and erase history.
“The fact that these negatives physically exist can’t be obscured or altered, and their value has only proved more significant over time,” says Xu.
Photos of the protests were seen everywhere in 1989, but they rarely saw the light of day in China. Even publishing words related to the Tiananmen Square protests could lead to criminal liability. In publishing these taboo images, Xu doesn’t directly address the content of the images, but deliberates on how to deliver the immutable qualities of these images.
The bloody conflict of the Tiananmen Square massacre does not appear in Negatives, and only the final image of a tank clearing up the square on the last page—ominously marked as “page 64″— portends the end of the student movement. In Negatives/Scan, the penultimate image also points to a menacing end for the protesters, with a group of soldiers pointing guns at two unarmed men with a bicycle. Xu doesn’t hide any implicit messages in these photos.
Negative/Scan. (Photo by Xu Yong)
Confiscated on the way back to China
After photographing the events of Tiananmen Square, Xu went back to a project he began in 1985 — Hutong 101. By the end of June 1989, there was an oppressive silence in Beijing, which affected Xu’s mood while shooting the series. He was inspired by his former work at an advertising agency for the series, and his images scrupulously avoid typology, and the focus is on consciousness and flow.
Hutong’s are normally full of hustle and bustle, but he deliberately leaves people out of his shot. In the book’s final image, he presents a three generation family in a Hutong courtyard, with their solemn eyes staring straight into the camera lens.
Hutong 101 was one of the first collections of contemporary personal photography in China after the Cultural Revolution, and was serialized in Japan by two of the country’s most venerable publishing houses.
While Hutong 101 features some clear structural and conceptual thinking, Xu’s work on Tiananmen Square is all about recording the events of the protest. Xu was quite different from the foreign photojournalists at the scene; he was a local taking photos, and he brought a different set of emotions and sensibilities to his work. Xu doesn’t believe that photography is solely a medium to communicate information, and he used his training in traditional, modern and advertising photography techniques to bring out different aspects of the Tiananmen Square protests.
In addition, at the time, the price of a colour film roll was equivalent to one-third the monthly salary of an ordinary worker in Beijing. He needed considerable self-discipline to press the shutter button, and would only take two to three quality shots for each scene. If the Tiananmen Square protests happened today, Xu says his photo-taking style would be quite different.
Xu attended two exhibitions of Negatives in Germany and France in 2014, and photo books were published in preparation for those events. When he goes to Hong Kong (or entrusts a friend to go) to pick up newly printed copies of the photobooks, he tries to bring back three or four copies back to Beijing with him. He has to be extremely careful when he passes through the airport though. He’s tried to send books via Fedex, but they were all confiscated by customs.
“The Chinese authorities know about my photo exhibitions. They probably think I’m some weirdo, but overall, I don’t get into too much trouble,” says Xu.
“In China, I can only give these photo books book to friends I really trust.”

好報新聞來源:報導者

想要收到更多新聞、工作、兼職資訊,歡迎訂閱工作好報!!

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

賴鐸洋/明日記憶1

在個人認知中,一件攝影作品往往能反映出作者內心深層人格特質,如同一面鏡子,不過,並非單純透過觀察一個人的外貌、短暫的交流與外在樹立的形象那般易於察覺。 它必須藉由長期交談或觀察與相處所累積而來的分析才能加以判斷,藉由口述者與介紹者的角度,運用詞彙的力量加以描述,才能使觀賞者在短暫有限的時間下體會作品中所散發的真實含意。 有些作者拍攝作品依賴的是自身的潛意識直觀本能,或對於自身沉溺的喜好即興取材;有的作者採用目地探討性的長期追蹤、融入環境來觀察已發生的現象與現況,往往需花費長時間的累積來建構作品;更有些無需理由也並不需謹慎的思考,凡事皆以放鬆心情與隨遇而安的態度,於生活中產生的奇趣現象加以捕捉。 另外一部分,則是為了創造與突破既定的攝影認知、開創新的視野帶領讀者透過未曾思考過的角度去面對嶄新的理念傳達。 我接觸攝影時,已是10年前的往事,當時相關的攝影作品除了藉由國外留學資源去探索國內未知的一環,不然便是想盡辦法透過管道購買書籍,研究外國世界影像發展與脈絡。只是台灣的出版業並不在乎發展與提升,一切皆以銷售數字為基本考量,能夠閱讀的來源因此相當受限與狹隘。 從未擁有豐沛資源的我,只能藉著自我摸索與強烈的企圖心,克服言語不通的障礙,想盡辦法接觸未知的領域,也藉由實務取材拍攝,不斷累積經驗與揣摩找尋屬於內心鍾情嚮往的攝影定位。 我開始探索內心,也不斷試問自己,如何取材?以及自己到底是誰? 然而「記憶」對我而言有種無法割捨的牽絆,透過拍攝的過程影響,也牽動日後所產生的軌跡。 Fill 1 Fill 1 Fill 1 Fill 1 好報新聞來源: 報導者 想要收到更多新聞、工作、兼職資訊,歡迎訂閱工作好報!!

【圖文故事】在民主女神的注視下,從歷史縱深反思六四30週年

香港銅鑼灣書店負責人林榮基在6月4日晚上,到自由廣場六四天安門事件30週年晚會呼籲,要大家在思考六四運動時,不要只反思運動本身,而是要去思考,為什麼中國可以專制千年?30年來都沒有反思出新東西,因此六四運動不能只是單純以單一事件看待,而是應該往前推,必須關注中國幾千年來的專制問題。 林榮基認為,幾千年的專制政權和文化息息相關,「我們文化是不是出了問題?我希望香港和台灣、中國的朋友可以從這個角度思考,我認為這才是對六四的真正反思。」 主辦單位華人民主書院表示,六四死難者數以千計,30年來沒有官員負責,連家屬弔祭都不允許。六四後,中國「有經改、無政改」,造成貪官橫行,人權掃地,「我們不僅要追究屠殺罪責,更要抗議進行中的人權壓迫。」 「中國能否由獨裁走向民主,將決定台灣乃至人類文明的命運。台灣人李明哲為聲援中國民運,雖失去自由仍持續在獄中抗爭。我們不能自掃門前雪,必須主動聲援中國、港澳民眾反抗專制的努力。」 「近年來,中國一面加強武力威迫,一面多方滲透利誘,向我們推銷『只有一國、沒有兩制』的『九二共識』。為了自己和下一代的未來,我們必須堅守 國家 主權,貫徹轉型正義,強化民主防衛。」 Fill 1 Fill 1 自由廣場上巨大的坦克裝置藝術。 Fill 1 自由廣場六四晚會現場。 Fill 1 一名老人在自由廣場拍下紀念天安門事件的海報。 Fill 1 一名參與者舉著寫著「毋忘六四」的血衣。 Fill 1 Fill 1 銅鑼灣書店老闆林榮基。 Fill 1 前解放軍軍官李曉明(右一)。 Fill 1 自由廣場上參加晚會的民眾。 好報新聞來源: 報導者 想要收到更多新聞、工作、兼職資訊,歡迎訂閱工作好報!!

長榮空服員vs.華航機師罷工 6個問題看懂關鍵差異

Q1 長榮空服員罷工8大訴求中,長榮公司強硬表示「禁搭便車」和「勞工董事」絕不退讓,甚至第一時間就以「勞工董事」罷工訴求對工會提告。但相對的,華航卻有勞工董事,勞工董事為何是長榮的紅線? 華航設立勞工董事,源於其官股近半、比照《國營事業管理法》35條規定,至少五分之一的席次由主管機關聘請工會推派代表擔任董事,勞工董事的權利義務和其他董事相當。不過,過去國營企業工會多由資方輔導成立、普遍關係「融洽」,替勞工權益把關並發揮關鍵的影響力較受質疑。 關於長榮這類民營公司,過去《證券交易法》修法時也曾提出增設勞工董事相關規定,但修法未果。目前,民營公司僅有「獨立董事」 即不在企業任職,與經營管理者無重要業務或專業聯繫,可對企業事務做出獨立判斷的董事。 ,沒有勞工董事的法源依據。 長榮董事會僅有6席一般董事、3席獨立董事,若釋出或增設一席董事給工會,即可能對董事會決策有影響力,這是長榮資方不惜提告反制工會、堅決不開放勞工董事席次的主因。 Q2 雖然目前台灣沒有法律要求民營上巿公司需設勞工董事,但只要該公司董事會同意,也可以設立勞工董事。 以德國為例,在二戰後,大企業開始設立勞工董事,最早也是勞資雙方協商出來後,才慢慢藉由立法去完善勞工董事的制度,像是BMW等大公司都有勞工董事。1998年,德國勞工董事制度確立50周年時,有很多研究指出,大部分資方團體都認為勞工董事參與管理是好事,對於增強員工向心力是有幫助的。 不過,德國企業的董事依職權區分「管理董事」、「監督董事」等,在職權分工上規範得相當明確和精細。台灣未來若要讓民營企業的勞工董事明文入法,權利義務也應討論。 Q3 華航機師罷工時,交通部一開始站在第一線斡旋,勞資5度協商達成共識後,才由勞動部次長劉士豪出面宣布結果。長榮空服員從罷工投票開始時,行政院即指示成立專案小組,交通部處理疏運、勞資爭議則由勞動部處理,為何有這樣的差異? 主要在於華航仍是官股近半的「半國營企業」,交通部能以「大股東」身份插手;但長榮是百分之百民營公司,過往飛安紀錄算是國內航空業的優等生,交通部民航局現有的政策工具,例如航權分配,都是看飛安與服務,沒有一項評分是與勞資爭議有關,交通部沒有政策工具可以逼資方上談判桌,因此長榮空服員罷工,從一開始就由...