跳到主要內容

Chris van Laak/以群眾為中心的吳哥攝影節

「對攝影師來說,連結非常的重要。」吳哥攝影節暨工作坊(Angkor Photo Festival & Workshops)總監林登麗(Jessica Lim)在開幕致詞中,回應前來參與的人群。活動舉辦的小鎮位於柬埔寨最具盛名的吳哥窟旁邊,會場附近遍布新殖民法式建築。一年一度的吳哥攝影節和吳哥攝影工作坊已舉辦14屆,是亞洲歷史最悠久的攝影節慶;即便地點偏遠,良好的口碑仍吸引亞洲攝影師每年前來共襄盛舉。
然而,對於最近參與吳哥攝影節的攝影師、編輯、策展人和其他攝影工作者來說,接下來工作將會備受挑戰,甚至比以往更加冒險。近來,有知名攝影師受到異常的拘留與逮捕:孟加拉攝影師Shahidul Alam才在(2018年)11月20日被保釋,在此之前他因為聲援示威的學生,而被送進監獄超過100天。他的言論被孟加拉當局視為挑釁,因而受到該國法規懲罰。
在這個每年12月初舉辦、為期10天的攝影節中,許多專業工作者都曾參與了要求釋放Alam的運動,他們對Alam重獲自由表示鬆一口氣。
新聞記者和攝影師依據工作地點和主題,多少會暴露在一定程度的風險中。但在這個一年一度的聚會裡,彼此的連結讓大家覺得安全。這是個交換想法和解決問題的地方,相較於許多專業工作者的母國,這裡的新聞自由度更高。
自2005年成立初期,位於柬埔寨的吳哥攝影節即不斷地在尋找空間。發展至今,他們的重點不在成果展示,而是專業間的交流與啟發。「多樣性是我們的重點,」林登麗補充說,「年輕的攝影師來自亞洲各地,回去後在各國宣傳我們的活動,希望將來能有更多台灣攝影師申請參加工作坊。」
除了為時一週、專為新銳攝影師而設的工作坊外,攝影節也為當地6~16歲間的孩童舉辦工作坊。
來自柬埔寨暹粒的Roun Ry是位專業攝影師。除了拍攝商業作品之外,他也以家鄉傳統生活方式去發展與社會和環境相關的議題。他的攝影職涯從2011年的兒童工作坊開始,現在他也是吳哥工作坊的導師。藉由攝影節,開啟了他與編輯和策展人之間的連結,並有機會與像路透社(Reuters)、世界新聞攝影基金會(World Press Photo Foundation)這樣的專業機構交流、討論他的作品。對Roun來說,攝影節「激勵年輕攝影師去深入探討並更上層樓」。
此外,攝影節也規劃了一個小型特展。在暹粒的市中心,Huiying Ore的作品沿著暹粒河畔展示在戶外,吸引遊客和當地人的目光。
她的作品記錄了寮國北邊的小鎮——磨丁市(Boten)。中國投資客曾承諾斥資15億美元,將這個邊境小鎮打造成博奕度假區。由於在中國賭博是違法的,他們期待這裡能成為探險的財富天堂。即便一切都照計畫進行,但最終投資客似乎失去興趣,在鎮上徒留半完工的觀光建設,及無人光顧的商店。
Fill 1

在戶外的小型特展。(攝影/Chris van Laak)

吳哥攝影節不針對特定政治議題,而是開啟藝術作品表達真相的空間,爭取其自由發聲的環境。在許多亞洲國家和世界各地這種創作自由都備受威脅,攝影節所面對的環境和其他地方大同小異。林登麗強調,這是全球共同面對的問題:「拒絕普世價值,或用西方帝國主義觀點來一味地批判,並沒有任何幫助。」
在新聞自由指數排名第142的柬埔寨,言論自由在政府不允許異己立場的管控之下,幾乎無生存空間。然而,吳哥攝影節因其國際化形象、並以聚焦當地觀眾為導向,成為當代最重要的相關攝影節慶之一。
攝影節成立以來雖已有數年,但仍需不斷地和瞬息萬變的環境磨合,例如他們需要維持各種贊助來源,或是在印刷技術有限的柬國製作專業印刷品。在中國的投資下,近年柬埔寨許多產業已漸趨專業化。
暹粒提供的高級住宿,遠超過前來吳哥攝影節的參訪者的預算。愈來愈多的中國遊客在此砸下大錢,而柬埔寨則張開雙手歡迎他們。柬埔寨在各領域都和中國有所合作,近年還跨含政治與行政層面。對此,自2005年即參與攝影節的Francoise Callier,他的觀察是:「對中國來說,寮國已開發完畢,接下來輪到柬埔寨了。」
而中國政府與柬國政府間愈趨親密的關係,可能會間接影響像吳哥攝影節這樣的組織。雖然在當地和柬國官方的合作上並沒有審查方面的問題,但類似的節慶在中國的情況就不一樣了。同樣於2018年12月開展的連州國際攝影年展,策展小組到最後一刻都還在與審查制度協調,其中Erwin Blumenfeld的代表性時尚攝影作品,最終在當局的意見之下取消部分展出。
在吳哥攝影節中,其中一晚的幻燈片投影展示了中國當代紀實攝影作品——這個區塊活動在攝影節行之有年,而今年由王溪策劃。攝影節自創辦初期即與中國藝術家及記者合作,這些少數但知名的專業攝影師也是團隊的一份子。
自2010年起開始加入策展團隊的盧廣,在這次的攝影節中突然行蹤成謎。2018年11月初時,中國攝影師盧廣被西北邊的新疆省政府拘捕,直至12月,公安局才證實盧廣被他們羈押,但沒有說明原因。他的作品被展示在幻燈片上,而他被拘留一事也成為攝影節中的話題。
在12月的暹粒聚會中,這些攝影工作者雖然在不同的國家中工作,創作主題也不盡相同,但他們有共同面對困境的感覺。
與菲律賓環境難民工作的Veejay Villafranca,在他身處的環境,記者常遭到非法處決,他相信媒體應該用真相抵抗權力:「我們不會用政府想要的方式滿足大眾。對記者來說更重要的是,我們有彼此作為後盾」。
Fill 1

2018吳哥攝影節開幕放映。(攝影/Chris van Laak)

“For photographers, community is now more important than ever.” The opening words of Jessica Lim, director of Angkor Photo Festival and Workshop, resonated with the crowd that had gathered around the lavish French neocolonial architecture of the Cambodian town close to the famous temples of Angkor Wat. The annual Angkor Photo Festival and Workshop is in its 14th edition, which makes it the longest running festival of its kind in Asia, – it has established itself very well in the schedules of professionals all over the continent despite its remote location.
But the photographers, editors, curators and other professionals, who visit the festival most recently, know that doing their jobs might be more difficult, even more dangerous than ever. Some high profile photographers have been arrested and detained for unusual long times recently : Shahidul Alam of Bangladesh has recently been released on bail on 11/20 after he had spoken out in favor of protesting students and therefore spent more than 100 days in prison – as his statement was deemed “provocative” and therefore punishable under Bangladeshi laws.
Many of the professionals involved in the festivals events and exhibitions which run for 10 days in early December have been involved in campaigns demanding Alam’s release – now many express relief that their friend is free.
Depending on the location and subject of their work, journalists and photographers are exposed to more or less of a risk, but here, where people come together annually, the ones involved feel relief in a strong community. It is a place for exchange of ideas and solutions to problems – a forum that many professionals don’t find in their countries with a lesser developed journalistic infrastructure.
From its beginning in 2005 the festival has been working on filling that void in Cambodia. And still today the focus is not as much on showcasing works, as it is on exchange between professionals and aspiring professionals. “Diversity is crucial for us.” described Jessica Lim. “Young photographers from all over Asia join our festival and then become our ambassadors in their countries. We hope we will get more workshop applications from Taiwan in the future”, she added.
Besides a weeklong workshop for aspiring professionals, the festival also runs workshops for local children between the ages 6 and 16.
Roun Ry of Cambodia is a professional photographer based in Siem Reap. He shoots commercial assignments, but he also covers social and environmental issues, as well as traditional lifestyles in his home province. His career started as a participant in the children’s workshop in 2011. Now he is also a teacher in the workshop and sees the festival as an occasion to connect with editors and curators, to show and discuss his work in Portfolio Review events with professionals of institutions such as Reuters or the World Press Photo Foundation. For Roun, the festival “encourages and pushes young photographer to go deeper and understand more”.
The festival also showcases a small, but eclectic selection of photographic works. Huiying Ore’s photos were displayed in an outdoors exhibition along the Siem Reap River that meanders through the city center catching the eyes of tourists and locals alike. In her works she documents the small town of Boten in Northern Laos. The Chinese investors had promised 1.5 billion for further developments in a casino resort there. As this kind of gambling is illegal in China, the town at the Laotian border was supposed to become a paradise for fortune and adventure seeking Chinese in which even all clocks are set to Chinese time. Eventually the Chinese investors must have lost interest in the project, leaving the town with half finished tourist infrastructure and local businesses without customers.
The festival doesn’t follow a political agenda, but it showcases art that speaks truth to power and requires an environment of freedom of artistic expression. Even though this freedom is challenged in many countries in Asia as well as worldwide, Angkor still finds an environment to thrive in an unlikely place. For Jessica Lim, global issues need to be addressed, as “rejecting universal values and denouncing them for example as Imperialist Western is just a stupid argument”.
Cambodia is ranked 142th in the Freedom of Press Index, freedom of expression is “drastically curtailed” under a government that doesn’t allow an independently operating political opposition. Still with it’s international outlook combined with a focus on a local audience, the festival manages to stay relevant.
The festival has grown over the years, but it still needs to adapt to an ever changing environment, for example funding has to be secured from a multitude of sponsors, prints have to be made in a country that that still has little experience in professional printmaking. Still in recent years Cambodia has developed in many sectors and professionalism many industries with the help of Chinese investments.
Siem Reap offers world class accommodation far beyond the budget of the ordinary visitors to Angkor Photo festival. Nowadays more and more Chinese tourists visit the city and the famous temples for a short luxury vacation and Cambodia is glad to cater their very specific needs. Between Cambodia and China there is cooperation in all sectors and as of late especially also in politics and administration. Francoise Callier, who initiated the festival in 2005, observes the developments: “For China Laos is already done, Cambodia is next.”
The governments of Cambodia and China moving closer together might have impact on institutions such as the Angkor Photo Festival. While the organizers cooperate with local Cambodian authorities and censorship is not directly an issue, at similar festivals in China the situation is much different. At the Lianzhou Foto festival which started last December, curators had to negotiate with censors until the last minute and significant works, such as iconic fashion photos by Erwin Blumenfeld had to be pulled from the show due to some very late changes in the opinion of the censorship authority.
At the Angkor photo festival, one evening of slideshow projections is reserved for the works of contemporary Chinese documentary photography – an event that has been part of the festival for many years and is curated by Wang Xi this year. The festival has been cooperating with Chinese artists and journalists since early on and few, but high profile Chinese professionals are part of the community that gathers here.
Lu Guang, who has been member of the team of curators at Angkor in 2010, was missed dearly in the festival’s most recent edition. In early November 2018 Lu Guang was abducted by the authorities in the Western Chinese Province of Xinjiang. Only recently his detainment has been confirmed by the police without reasons given. His photos are still shown in the slideshows and his detainment is discussed among visitors to the festival.
The professionals gathered in Siem Reap in December work on different subjects and in different countries, but many feel like they are struggling together.
Veejay Villafranca who works on environmental refugees on the Philippines, in an environment where extrajudicial killings of journalists happen frequently is convinced that journalists have to speak truth to power : “We will not spoon-feed the public with what governments want. It is important that we journalists know that we have each other’s backs”.
第15屆吳哥攝影節與工作坊(The Angkor Photo Festival & Workshops)

2019年5月1日開放申請。
申請期限至2019年6月30日PM5:00(GMT+7)。結果將在2019年8月中旬公告。

申請與選取標準和要求:
申請者必須是亞洲國籍並有經驗的學生或專業攝影師。
工作坊將以英文進行。
參與者必須自備數位相機及筆記型電腦。
參與者必須會使用基礎的照片編修軟體。

費用:
免申請費,免工作坊學費。
提供2019年11月27日到12月7日的住宿。
參與者需自行規劃到柬埔寨吳哥窟的旅程。
不提供簽證及轉乘費用。

申請文件:
個人簡歷、個人論述、一組12~20張照片的作品集。

Application Opens 1st May 2019
Deadline: 30th June 2019, 5pm (GMT+7)
Application results will be announced by mid-August 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA & REQUIREMENTS

Applicants must be either a student OR a professional photographer of Asian nationality with limited professional experience.
The workshop will be conducted in English.
Participants will have to bring their own digital DSLR camera and laptop.
Participants should be able to use basic photo editing software (eg: Lightroom, Photoshop, Aperture etc.)

EXPENSES

The workshop is tuition-free, with no application fee.
Accommodation will be provided from 27th November – 7th December 2019. (Checkout on 8th December)
Participants have to make their own travel arrangements to Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Visa fees and transport expenses are not provided.

【SUBMISSION MATERIALS】

1. BRIEF CV / RESUME
吳哥攝影節與工作坊For Students:

Course and institution of study
Expected year of graduation
Any previous photography workshops/internships/courses attended

For Professionals:

Details on current and previous professional experience (including freelance and internships)
Any previous photography workshops/internships/courses attended

2. PERSONAL STATEMENTWe want to get to know you better. Tell us about your experience with photography, and why you would like to attend our workshop. (Maximum 250 words).3. PORTFOLIO SUBMISSIONYour portfolio of work should reflect your vision and style as a photographer.

Filename: All images should include your full name. (Eg: Amy_Tan_001.jpg)
Number of images: Minimum 12 – Maximum 20 photos per portfolio
Image Size: 2,000 pixels on longer side / 72dpi / JPG format / Medium quality (8)

[ Optional: You may choose to upload one additional file with text or caption information in the following formats: .doc, .docx, .pdf ]

好報新聞來源:報導者

想要收到更多新聞、工作、兼職資訊,歡迎訂閱工作好報!!

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

《凝視・1095》影像集:8張照片的背後

壹 Fill 1 文、攝影/蘇威銘 那是又濕又悶的7月,我因為拍攝遊覽車司機的影像專題,在中正紀念堂外隨機尋找遊覽車司機搭訕,晚上8點半左右,停在中正紀念堂外側的遊覽車幾乎都熄火了,只剩少數幾台還亮著車頭燈,阿銘是唯一願意與我暢聊的遊覽車司機。他因為 工作 緣故,得在台北連續待上20天,接待來自不同 國家 的旅遊團,這樣的工作狀況,早已是遊覽車司機業不能說的祕密。 阿銘年約40,但因為長期過勞,臉上已滿佈黑眼圈、皺紋。某天,我跟他回下榻飯店聊天,一回飯店,阿銘馬上打開手機,與遠在高雄的老婆、兩個小孩視訊。看到已經十幾天未見的父親,兩個小孩興奮地與阿銘分享學校的事情,約聊到11點後才關掉手機,隔天清晨5點,又要備車,出車上工了。我問阿銘,何時才能回高雄?他說,他也不知道。 這張照片是阿銘結束一天工作後,準備去停車場清理、停放遊覽車的過程,被我記錄下來。當天由於阿銘與旅行社領隊起了衝突,領隊打給車行老闆要老闆解僱阿銘,不然再也不跟車行合作了。老闆憤怒在電話中用髒話咒罵阿銘,並要他跟領隊道歉。這張照片的拍攝時間點,便是在阿銘遭受委屈、道歉之後。 當時選擇在這個場域、時機按下快門,因為觀察到阿銘疲憊、委屈的神情,奮力但又無力的手勢,與車窗外台北寂寥景色形成呼應,而他在衝突過後,仍然得完成工作的內心糾結、埋怨,傳遞出小人物受到壓迫,難以改變現況的無力感,這樣的感受,也觸發我在那個空間、時刻,按下快門。 延伸閱讀:〈巴士運將的希望── 一切都平安〉 貳 Fill 1 文、攝影/簡永達 走進死者阮文薦的越南老家,首先感受到的,是一種巨大且難以名狀的悲傷。罹難者的家裡,沒有想像中的哭嚎,取而代之的是莫名的安靜。阮文薦屍骨還鄉兩個月以來,他的父親會失神地看著臉書上的照片、他的母親反覆擦拭遺照,如果不小心留眼淚,她會趕緊用袖口擦掉。 和他同在台灣工作的哥哥阮文忠,回國後陷入無盡的自責,「我沒有阻止弟弟來台灣,我覺得是我的責任。」他悼念弟弟的方式,是一個人躲在KTV中,點播那些兄弟生前一起歡唱過的歌。 阮文薦的大哥告訴我,自從弟弟去世後,家裡沒有交談聲、笑聲,也沒有哭聲。家裡每個人都用各自的方式處理悲傷,卻又極力掩飾自己的情緒。直到採訪的最後一天,我表示希望能到阮文薦的墳前上香,為他在台灣的不幸遭...

【投書】倫敦地鐵移除汶萊航空廣告,台北捷運呢?

汶萊長期以來視同性戀為不合法行為,從今年(2019)4月3日起全面實施《伊斯蘭法刑法典》,新法規定可對男同性戀及通姦者施以石頭砸死之刑、女同性戀鞭刑40下的殘酷刑罰。這項規定適用於穆斯林、非穆斯林以及外國人,也適用於註冊於汶萊的航空器與船隻。 美國藝人喬治.克隆尼(George Clooney)因此發起抵制汶萊政府在倫敦等地擁有的星級豪華飯店,已獲得眾多演藝人士響應;德意志銀行也宣布所有員工差旅不會使用汶萊政府擁有的飯店。 這些國外的豪華飯店,大概不會是一般台灣人旅遊住宿的選項,但我們可以將焦點放在台北捷運站裡,寫著「搭乘汶萊皇家航空、體驗汶萊和平國度」醒目字眼的大幅廣告。這項汶萊皇家航空(Royal Brunei Airlines)的廣告行銷,對每日進出台北各捷運站的同志市民、性別平等支持者是多大的諷刺與傷害。 和平國度?各國單位杯葛汶萊 汶萊皇家航空是該國國營航空公司,這則廣告同時在行銷航空公司與汶萊作為和平的旅遊目的地,廣告中的「和平國度」(an “abode of peace”)不只是該國的觀光宣傳口號(tourism slogan),也是汶萊的 國家 官方全稱 汶萊的馬來文為Negara Brunei Darussalam。Negara意為「國家」,而Darussalam則意為「和平之邦」。 之一。汶萊皇家航空廣告也同時投放在其他國家,如倫敦的地鐵站,但在反恐同、反歧視團體譴責汶萊極端恐同法律與抗議這則廣告宣傳的壓力之下,倫敦交通當局(Transport for London)以違反廣告原則的公眾敏感與爭議下,已迅速於4月3日移除汶萊的廣告。 同樣身為航空業的澳洲維珍航空(Virgin Australia),也跟進宣布為確保公司成員的安全,取消與汶萊皇家航空的員工旅遊協議。以銷售學生與青年票務為主的國際旅行社STA也表明其支持多元文化與LGBTQI的立場,停止販售汶萊皇家航空機票與介紹有關任何行程,並將協助已購買汶萊皇家航空機票的客戶進行退票等服務。 對比汶萊皇家航空的廣告爭議,今年3月挪威航空將美國人權鬥士與同運前輩哈維.米爾克(Harvey Milk) 美國LGBT權利運動人士,也是美國政壇中第一位公開同性戀身分的政治人物。 塗裝於其客機尾翼上,向其爭取人權平等的努力致敬。 長期推動永續觀光的...

死了一個女孩之後,看見人性的善惡抉擇

【精選書摘】 本文為王立柔替《被殺了三次的女孩:誰讓恐怖情人得逞?桶川跟蹤狂殺人案件的真相及警示》撰寫的推薦序〈平凡人也能選擇的善良或邪惡〉,經獨步文化授權刊登,文章標題與文內小標經《報導者》編輯所改寫。 《被殺了三次的女孩:誰讓恐怖情人得逞?桶川跟蹤狂殺人案件的真相及警示》是日本迴響最大的調查報導作品,該書作者清水潔曾為新潮社《FOCUS》週刊調查記者,現為日本電視台報導局記者、解說員。他以桶川跟蹤狂殺人事件的調查報導獲得日本新聞 工作 者會議(Japan Congress of Journalists)大獎、編輯嚴選雜誌報導獎。 這不是一本虛構的懸疑偵探小說,而是前《FOCUS》週刊記者清水潔對「桶川跟蹤狂殺人案件」的真實調查紀錄。 1999年,日本埼玉縣女大學生豬野詩織在JR桶川車站外,冷不防被人用刀刺死。乍看像隨機殺人案,但在清水潔的一連串調查下,真相漸漸水落石出:豬野詩織的前男友是恐怖情人,長期騷擾並威脅她的人身安全。雖然她曾經自行蒐證,帶著錄音機向警方報案,卻得到「不會成案」的回覆,甚至反過來被譴責「收了人家禮物,才說要分手,做男人的怎麼會不生氣?」走投無路的詩織最終在絕望中被殺死。 這起事件催生了日本國會訂定《跟蹤騷擾行為規範法》,但這些都是後話。在慘案剛發生的時候,詩織之死雖然引發社會震驚,民眾對受害人的同情很快就打了折扣。一方面是因為警方不斷放出關於受害人的不實資訊,一方面是各家媒體在報導時聚焦於詩織身上的穿著、名牌配件,暗示她有「拜金」傾向,並將她的職業誤報為「酒家女」。雖然說無論受害人是否符合這兩點,都不應該被任何人殺死,但日本社會輿論一度產生「責怪受害人」的氛圍。 「我的女兒死了3次:一次是被兇手殺死的,一次是被不受理報案的警方殺死的,一次是被媒體殺死的。」 豬野詩織的父親豬野憲一多年後再度接受清水潔的訪問時,曾經這樣說。這名傷痛的爸爸不僅控訴殘忍的兇手和怠惰的警方,也深深控訴了醜化受害者、畫錯重點的新聞媒體。 這起案件的時空背景是20年前的日本,然而這樣的「劇情發展」對今天的台灣讀者來說很熟悉吧?沒錯,「新聞媒體」的面向是此書最值得探討的重點之一。作者清水潔的筆下,處處都是對新聞產製生態及閱聽文化的批判,讓人一面讀一面驚呼:「原來20年前的日本新聞也是這樣啊!」、...